The LA Dodgers Win the World Series, But for Hispanic Supporters, It's Not So Simple
For Natalia Molina and third-generation Mexican American, the most memorable highlight of the World Series didn't happen during the tense finale last Saturday, when her team executed one dramatic comeback act after another before winning in overtime against the opposing team.
It came a game earlier, when two supporting athletes, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, pulled off a electrifying, game-winning play that at the same time upended numerous negative misconceptions promoted about Latinos in recent decades.
The play in itself was stunning: Hernández charged in from left field to catch a ball he initially misjudged in the bright lights, then fired it to the infield to record another, game-winning play. the second baseman, positioned nearby, received the ball just a split second before a opposing player collided with him, sending him to the ground.
This was not merely a remarkable athletic moment, possibly the key shift in momentum in the team's direction after appearing for most of the games like the underdog side. To her, it was thrilling, politically and culturally, a much-required morale boost for Latinos and for Los Angeles after months of immigration raids, security forces patrolling the neighborhoods, and a steady stream of criticism from official sources.
"Kike and Miggy presented this counter-narrative," explained Molina. "Everyone witnessed Latinos showing an contagious enthusiasm in what they do, acting as leaders on the team, having a different kind of masculinity. They're energetic, they're cheering, they're taking off their shirts."
"It was such a contrast with what we observe on the news – raids, Latinos thrown to the ground and chased down. It's so simple to be demoralized these days."
However, it's exactly simple to be a team fan these days – for Molina or for the many of other fans who show up faithfully to home games and fill up as many as half of the venue's 50,000 seats per game.
A Complicated Connection with the Team
After aggressive enforcement operations began in Los Angeles in early June, and military units were deployed into the city to respond to resulting protests, two of the city's soccer clubs quickly issued statements of support with affected communities – while the Dodgers.
Management has said the organization want to stay away of politics – a stance influenced, possibly, by the reality that a sizable portion of the supporters, even Latinos, are followers of current leaders. After considerable public pressure, the organization later committed $1m in support for families directly affected by the raids but made no public condemnation of the administration.
Official Event and Past Legacy
Three months before, the team did not delay in agreeing to an invitation to mark their previous championship victory at the White House – a move that sports columnists labeled as "disappointing … weak … and contradictory", given the team's boast in having been the pioneering professional team to break the color barrier in the 1940s and the regular invocations of that legacy and the values it represents by officials and present and former athletes. A number of players including the coach had expressed unwillingness to go to the White House during the first term but then changed their minds or gave in to demands from team management.
Corporate Control and Supporter Dilemmas
A further issue for supporters is that the team are owned by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose equity holdings, as per sources and its own released balance sheets, include a share in a detention company that operates detention centers. Guggenheim's leadership has said many times that it aims to remain neutral of politics, but its critics say the silence – and the investment – are their own form of acquiescence to current policies.
These factors contribute to considerable conflicted emotions among Hispanic supporters in especial – sentiments that surfaced even in the excitement of this season's hard-fought World Series victory and the following explosion of Dodgers pride across Los Angeles.
"Is it okay to root for the team?" area writer one observer reflected at the start of the playoffs in an thoughtful article pondering on "team loyalty in our blood, but doubt in our minds". He was unable to finally bring himself to view the championship, but he still cared strongly, to the point that he believed his one-man protest must have brought the squad the fortune it needed to win.
Distinguishing the Team from the Management
Many supporters who share similar reservations seem to have concluded that they can keep to support the team and its lineup of global players, including the Asian superstar a key player, while pouring scorn on the organization's business overlords. Nowhere was this more evident than at the championship parade at Dodger Stadium on Monday, when the packed audience roared in approval of the manager and his players but booed the executive and the top official of the investors.
"The executives in suits do not get to claim our boys in blue from us," Molina said. "We have been with the Dodgers for more time than they have."
Past Context and Community Impact
The problem, however, runs deeper than only the team's current owners. The agreement that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles in the 1950s involved the city demolishing three low-income Hispanic communities on a elevated area above downtown and then transferring the property to the organization for a fraction of its actual worth. A track on a mid-2000s album that chronicles the story has an low-income parking attendant at the venue revealing that the home he lost to eviction is now a part of the field.
A prominent commentator, perhaps southern California most influential Latino columnist and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, problematic relationship between the franchise and its fanbase. He calls the Dodgers the popular snack of baseball, "a corporate entity with an undue, even harmful following by numerous Latinos" that has been exploiting its fans for decades.
"They have acted around Latino fans while picking their pockets with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," Arellano noted over the summer, when demands to boycott the team over its lack of reaction to the raids were contradicted by the uncomfortable fact that turnout at matches remained steady, even at the peak of the protests when downtown LA was subject to a evening curfew.
International Stars and Community Bonds
Separating the squad from its corporate owners is not a easy matter, {