🔗 Share this article

Among some of the most recognizable images of the twentieth century portrays an unclothed girl, her arms extended, her expression twisted in agony, her body scorched and flaking. She is fleeing toward the camera as escaping a bombing during the conflict. Beside her, youngsters are fleeing from the bombed hamlet of the region, amid a background of thick fumes and military personnel.

The Global Effect from a Powerful Image

Shortly after the publication in June 1972, this picture—originally called The Terror of War—became a traditional phenomenon. Witnessed and debated globally, it has been widely credited with energizing public opinion opposing the US war in Vietnam. An influential critic afterwards observed that the deeply lasting picture featuring the young Kim Phúc suffering probably did more to heighten global outrage against the war compared to a hundred hours of broadcast violence. A legendary British war photographer who reported on the war described it the ultimate photo of the so-called the media war. A different veteran combat photographer remarked that the picture is simply put, a pivotal photographs ever taken, particularly of the Vietnam war.

A Decades-Long Credit and a New Assertion

For half a century, the photo was attributed to Huynh Cong “Nick” Út, an emerging South Vietnamese photographer employed by a major news agency in Saigon. However a disputed recent documentary streaming on a streaming service claims which states the iconic picture—often hailed as the peak of war journalism—might have been taken by someone else present that day in Trảng Bàng.

As presented in the investigation, The Terror of War was in fact photographed by an independent photographer, who sold his photos to the news agency. The claim, and the film’s subsequent research, began with a man named an ex-staffer, who claims how the dominant photo chief instructed the staff to reassign the photograph's attribution from the original photographer to Út, the one employed photographer there at the time.

This Quest to find the Truth

The former editor, advanced in years, reached out to one of the journalists recently, requesting assistance in finding the unnamed photographer. He expressed how, if he was still living, he hoped to offer an apology. The filmmaker thought of the freelance photojournalists he worked with—comparing them to current independents, who, like Vietnamese freelancers during the war, are routinely overlooked. Their work is often doubted, and they work amid more challenging conditions. They are not insured, no long-term security, minimal assistance, they frequently lack proper gear, and they remain extremely at risk as they capture images within their homeland.

The filmmaker pondered: How would it feel to be the man who made this photograph, if in fact Nick Út didn’t take it?” From a photographic perspective, he imagined, it would be deeply distressing. As a student of war photography, specifically the highly regarded war photography of the era, it could prove reputation-threatening, possibly reputation-threatening. The hallowed heritage of the photograph in the community is such that the filmmaker whose parents fled at the time was reluctant to pursue the project. He said, I was unwilling to unsettle the established story that credited Nick the photograph. Nor did I wish to disrupt the existing situation of a community that always respected this accomplishment.”

The Search Develops

However both the filmmaker and his collaborator agreed: it was important raising the issue. When reporters are going to keep the world responsible,” remarked the investigator, we must can ask difficult questions within our profession.”

The film tracks the investigators as they pursue their inquiry, from discussions with witnesses, to call-outs in today's Ho Chi Minh City, to reviewing records from related materials captured during the incident. Their efforts lead to an identity: a driver, employed by a television outlet that day who occasionally provided images to foreign agencies independently. As shown, a moved Nghệ, like others elderly and living in California, attests that he handed over the photograph to the agency for a small fee and a print, yet remained plagued by not being acknowledged for years.

The Response Followed by Further Investigation

He is portrayed throughout the documentary, reserved and thoughtful, however, his claim proved explosive within the world of war photography. {Days before|Shortly prior to