🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."