🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a growing chorus of states are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and networks are "stealing our children's youth". The policy may be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a proposal raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory resolution calling for a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is given. While it warns of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the move does not enact binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a good first step," stated a leading MEP behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, support grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the issue.

Charities have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who died after being exposed to harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and fit for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the state level due to federal inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law capping teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced bills requiring adult authorization for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various politicians to mimic the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Views

Beyond these regions, other nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies adopt a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve user protection.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that governments globally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.